The first person to laugh when Mara Ellison entered the courtroom was her mother-in-law.<\/p>\n
Ruth Ellison raised a graceful hand toward her mouth, as if she meant to hide the sound, but the small diamond bracelet at her wrist caught the overhead lights and drew attention to her all the same. Beside her, Frank Ellison leaned toward her with a pleased little smile. Across the aisle, their son, Andrew, sat between three attorneys whose polished shoes, dark suits, and thick folders seemed designed to make the room understand who had arrived prepared.<\/p>\n
Mara sat alone at the other table, with one leather briefcase and a glass of water in front of her.<\/p>\n
She could feel the looks from the gallery, some curious, some sympathetic, and a few plainly entertained. The Ellisons had brought a legal team. Mara had brought herself. To anyone watching, the difference probably seemed to tell the whole story.<\/p>\n
Judge Elaine Porter looked over her glasses. \u201cMrs. Ellison, you understand that you have the right to be represented by an attorney?\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cYes, Your Honor.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cAnd you\u2019ve chosen to represent yourself today?\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cI have.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n One of Andrew\u2019s attorneys stood. His name was Stephen Calder, and he had the composed manner of a man who had already decided how the morning would end. \u201cYour Honor, we\u2019re concerned that moving forward without counsel could create unnecessary complications. This matter is fairly straightforward.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Straightforward.<\/p>\n Mara rested her hands on the edge of the table. She had heard that word so often over the past several weeks that it had begun to sound less like a description and more like a warning.<\/p>\n Three weeks earlier, Andrew had set a stack of divorce papers beside her breakfast plate. He had done it without raising his voice, without looking especially troubled, and without offering more than the kind of explanation a person might give when canceling a dinner reservation.<\/p>\n Mara had read the documents once, then again, slowly enough to understand what had been left out.<\/p>\n \u201cSo you\u2019re saying I contributed nothing?\u201d<\/strong> she had asked.<\/p>\n Andrew had glanced at his phone. \u201cYou took care of the house.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cI took care of the house, your travel, your parents\u2019 appointments, and every family event for seven years.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n He had looked away, and his silence had felt like an answer he did not intend to say aloud.<\/p>\n For most of their marriage, the Ellisons had treated Mara as a devoted wife whose life revolved around supporting Andrew\u2019s ambitions. She planned the holidays, remembered the family birthdays, and helped him prepare for business dinners. At company gatherings, she was introduced as Andrew\u2019s wife, and she had learned to accept the description without adding anything about the person she had been before.<\/p>\n They had never asked much about that person.<\/p>\n Before she became Mara Ellison, she had been Captain Mara Pierce, an attorney in the United States Army. She had worked through long nights on cases where one missed date or overlooked sentence could change the course of a hearing. She had learned to organize evidence, question assumptions, and keep her voice steady when the room around her grew tense.<\/p>\n She had left military service years before, and she had rarely spoken about it at home. When she and Andrew first married, she had wanted a quieter life, one where a person could put away legal files and spend an evening making dinner without reviewing every word someone said for hidden meaning. She had not imagined that the same habits she had set aside would one day help her understand the documents on her own divorce table.<\/p>\n Now, in Judge Porter\u2019s courtroom, Calder\u2019s confidence and the Ellisons\u2019 amused glances had brought that earlier part of her back into focus.<\/p>\n Judge Porter turned to her. \u201cMrs. Ellison, you may begin.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Mara opened her briefcase and removed a slim folder.<\/p>\n The courtroom settled into silence as she stood.<\/p>\n Mara placed the folder on the table and looked toward the judge. \u201cYour Honor, before the court considers enforcing the marital settlement agreement, I need to establish one fact.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Calder smiled politely. \u201cThe agreement was signed by both parties.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Mara looked at him. \u201cThat\u2019s the problem.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n She turned back toward the bench. \u201cI never signed it.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Andrew\u2019s expression changed before anyone else\u2019s did. His smile disappeared, and his eyes fixed on the papers in front of him. Ruth lowered her hand from her mouth. Calder turned slowly toward his client, as if waiting for an explanation he had not expected to need.<\/p>\n Judge Porter leaned forward. \u201cAre you telling the court that the signature attributed to you may not be yours?\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cYes, Your Honor.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n The gallery stirred. Calder stood again. \u201cYour Honor, that is a serious claim. I would ask the court to give us an opportunity to respond before\u2014\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cMr. Calder,\u201d<\/strong> Judge Porter said, \u201cyour client\u2019s wife is representing herself. Let her finish.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n He sat down.<\/p>\n Mara removed a copy of the settlement agreement. It stated that she had voluntarily agreed to accept twenty-five thousand dollars in exchange for giving up any further claim to the marital estate. At the bottom of the final page, a typed signature bore her name and a date: March fourteenth.<\/p>\n \u201cThe agreement says I signed it on March fourteenth,\u201d<\/strong> she explained. \u201cThat day, I was in Colorado Springs for a military legal education conference. I have the conference registration, hotel records, airline receipts, and photographs from the event.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Calder rose. \u201cBeing at a conference doesn\u2019t prove she couldn\u2019t have signed electronically.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cThat\u2019s true,\u201d<\/strong> Mara said. \u201cWhich is why I requested the electronic signing records.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n She handed the judge a certificate from the electronic-signature service. It listed the email address used to access the agreement, the time of the signing session, and the internet address recorded by the service.<\/p>\n Judge Porter read it, then looked toward Calder. \u201cWhy does this certificate list an email address that does not appear in Mrs. Ellison\u2019s earlier court filings?\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Calder glanced at the papers before him. \u201cI\u2019ll need to verify that with my client, Your Honor.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Andrew leaned toward him. Their conversation was too quiet for Mara to hear, but she could see the change in Calder\u2019s face. His expression went from mild confusion to close attention, then to something more serious. Mara knew the look. She had seen it in hearing rooms when someone realized that a confident explanation might not withstand a careful review.<\/p>\n She did not feel triumphant. If the agreement had been submitted with a signature she had not made, the issue was larger than the pleasure of watching Andrew\u2019s lawyers lose their rhythm. She wanted the court to know what had happened, and she wanted the documents preserved so the truth would not depend on anyone\u2019s memory.<\/p>\n Judge Porter returned the certificate to her. \u201cThe court is not making a finding about the signature today. The agreement\u2019s authenticity is disputed, and I expect both sides to preserve every relevant electronic record.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cYes, Your Honor,\u201d<\/strong> Calder said.<\/p>\n Mara opened the folder again. \u201cThere\u2019s another detail about the account used to sign the agreement.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Calder let out a quiet breath, then caught himself when Judge Porter looked at him.<\/p>\n Mara showed the court a page from the materials exchanged before the hearing. \u201cThe email account was created eleven days before the agreement was signed. It uses my maiden name, Pierce, but I\u2019ve never owned or accessed it.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Andrew looked up. For the first time that morning, he met her eyes.<\/p>\n He knew how she spelled her maiden name on the records from her military service. He had asked her for copies of those records once, saying they were needed for a family insurance form. She had sent them without wondering why he needed them. At the time, the request had seemed ordinary.<\/p>\n Judge Porter studied the page. \u201cHow did you obtain this information?\u201d<\/strong> Calder stood. \u201cMrs. Ellison seems to be turning a divorce case into a broader investigation.\u201d<\/p>\n Mara kept her voice even. \u201cI\u2019m asking the court not to enforce an agreement I didn\u2019t make.\u201d<\/p>\n Judge Porter gave a small nod. \u201cThat is a reasonable distinction.\u201d<\/p>\n Then she addressed Andrew. \u201cMr. Ellison, you will not speak directly to your wife during these proceedings. If you have information relevant to the agreement, give it to your attorney.\u201d<\/p>\n Andrew\u2019s jaw tightened. \u201cYes, Your Honor.\u201d<\/p>\n Behind him, Ruth whispered to Frank. Frank no longer looked amused. His hands were folded tightly on his lap, and he stared at Mara as though the woman at the table had become someone he had not thought to meet.<\/p>\n For seven years, he had told her she was fortunate to have married into a stable family. He had spoken of the Ellison company as if it were a family inheritance she should be grateful to stand near, while making it clear that she was not expected to understand how the business worked. Whenever she asked Andrew about a confusing financial arrangement, Andrew said the numbers were complicated and that there was no reason to worry her.<\/p>\n Mara had believed him. Or, more accurately, she had wanted to believe that their marriage was built on trust, and she had sometimes mistaken avoiding an argument for preserving that trust.<\/p>\n Judge Porter called a brief recess.<\/p>\n As the judge left the bench, Andrew stood. \u201cMara.\u201d<\/p>\n She closed the folder and began placing her papers back into it.<\/p>\n Calder stepped between the tables before Andrew could move closer. \u201cLet\u2019s wait until we\u2019re outside.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cI just want to talk to her.\u201d<\/p>\n Mara looked up at her husband. His face was pale, but she saw no remorse in it yet, only the effort of a man trying to find words that would put him back in control.<\/p>\n \u201cYou can speak through your attorney,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n Then she turned back to her papers.<\/p>\n What the Company Reported<\/p>\n The financial disclosure Andrew had filed stated that his ownership share in Ellison Logistics was worth eighty thousand dollars. The company had grown over the years, but Andrew had always described it as a collection of contracts, equipment, and obligations that were difficult to explain to anyone outside the business.<\/p>\n Mara had never expected to become an expert in the company\u2019s finances. She had expected her husband to tell her the truth when they made decisions together.<\/p>\n The documents in the next section of her folder came from a commercial loan application filed six weeks before Andrew petitioned for divorce. The company had reported nearly four million dollars in net assets to a lender.<\/p>\n When the hearing resumed, Mara stood again.<\/p>\n \u201cYour Honor, there\u2019s another issue with Mr. Ellison\u2019s financial disclosure.\u201d<\/p>\n Calder closed his eyes for the briefest moment, then sat still.<\/p>\n Mara continued. \u201cMr. Ellison listed his ownership interest in Ellison Logistics at an estimated value of eighty thousand dollars.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThat figure was prepared using company records,\u201d Calder said.<\/p>\n Mara lifted the lender\u2019s report. \u201cThen I\u2019d like the court to know why the company reported nearly four million dollars in net assets to its commercial lender six weeks before the divorce filing.\u201d<\/p>\n The room became quiet.<\/p>\n Andrew looked at her, then down at the page. The question in his expression was plain: How had she found that?<\/p>\n Mara had wondered about the same thing after the divorce papers arrived. The answer was that she had stopped treating Andrew\u2019s explanations as a substitute for documents. Once she understood what the settlement would require her to sign away, she had asked for the records she was entitled to review, compared them with the disclosures, and followed the discrepancies until she reached the loan application.<\/p>\n The lender had supplied the information in response to a properly issued subpoena.<\/p>\n \u201cThese records were obtained through the court process,\u201d she said. \u201cThey show the financial information the company provided when it applied for a loan.\u201d<\/p>\n Calder stood. \u201cThe assets belong to a company. They aren\u2019t automatically marital property.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cI agree,\u201d Mara said.<\/p>\n He paused, apparently unprepared for her to concede the point.<\/p>\n \u201cA company\u2019s assets aren\u2019t the same as an owner\u2019s personal property,\u201d she continued. \u201cThe company\u2019s debts, ownership structure, business valuation, and the dates when the ownership interests were acquired all matter. I\u2019m not asking this court to award me four million dollars. I\u2019m asking why the financial statement I received gives such a different picture from the one submitted to the lender.\u201d<\/p>\n Judge Porter read the documents. \u201cHave you requested a forensic review of the company\u2019s records?\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cYes, Your Honor.\u201d<\/p>\n Calder cleared his throat. \u201cWe would oppose a broad review of private business information.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThen the parties can determine what records are relevant,\u201d Judge Porter said. \u201cThis court expects complete and accurate financial disclosures.\u201d<\/p>\n Frank leaned forward in the gallery. \u201cThis is ridiculous.\u201d<\/p>\n Judge Porter looked toward him. \u201cSir, you are not a party addressing the court. Please remain silent.\u201d<\/p>\n Frank settled back in his seat. The color in his face had deepened, and Ruth touched his sleeve as if to keep him from speaking again.<\/p>\n Mara had spent years hearing Frank describe Andrew as the family\u2019s future. At dinners, he spoke of the company\u2019s success as though it belonged entirely to his son, even when Andrew was careful to call it a shared family business. Frank had made room for Mara at the table but not in the conversation. Whenever she asked a question, someone would smile and say that business matters were best left to the people who understood them.<\/p>\n It had taken her longer than she wanted to admit to see the pattern. The first time she had questioned a company expense, Andrew had reassured her. The next time, she had convinced herself that she misunderstood. By the third or fourth time, she had begun to stop asking.<\/p>\n She understood now that peace could become a habit, and that a person could keep it by quietly carrying questions she deserved to ask.<\/p>\n Judge Porter called another recess.<\/p>\n This time, Andrew remained seated while the other attorneys gathered at the end of the table. Calder listened to him, took notes, and spoke quietly with the other two lawyers. Mara watched their faces change as they moved through the documents. The room no longer seemed divided between people with a legal team and a woman with an empty table. It seemed divided between people who had records and people who needed to explain them.<\/p>\n Mara packed the documents carefully. She had no desire to make Andrew look foolish in front of his parents. She had not come to court for an audience. She had come because the papers he wanted her to accept did not reflect what she knew, and because she had spent too many years believing that asking for clarity made her difficult.<\/p>\n Calder approached her while the judge was away.<\/p>\n \u201cMrs. Ellison, perhaps we can discuss a temporary arrangement outside the courtroom.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019m willing to discuss reasonable terms through the proper process.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cYour husband says he didn\u2019t know about the account.\u201d Calder glanced back toward Andrew. \u201cThat may take time.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cI understand.\u201d<\/p>\n She did. A truthful answer could take time to establish. What she would not do was treat uncertainty as a reason to sign away her rights.<\/p>\n The Record That Remained<\/p>\n The hearing did not end with a dramatic confession. There was no sudden admission from Andrew, no final speech that made every person in the room understand what he had done, and no ruling that settled the entire divorce before lunch.<\/p>\n Judge Porter returned to the bench and moved carefully through the issues before her. She declined to enforce the disputed settlement agreement while its authenticity remained unresolved. She ordered the parties to preserve the electronic-signature records, the relevant email data, and the materials associated with the company\u2019s financial statements. She also directed them to work with a neutral financial professional to identify which business records were necessary for a fair valuation.<\/p>\n \u201cThe court is not deciding today that anyone forged a document or concealed assets,\u201d she said. \u201cThose are serious questions, and they require evidence. What I will say is that the agreement cannot be treated as settled while one party disputes having signed it.\u201d<\/p>\n Mara listened without moving. The words were measured, but they meant the court would not simply accept the papers Andrew had placed before her as a finished matter.<\/p>\n Judge Porter set a date for a follow-up hearing and instructed both sides to submit a proposed schedule for exchanging records. She asked whether the parties could agree to temporary support and the payment of routine household expenses while the financial review was underway.<\/p>\n After conferring with Calder, Andrew agreed to continue paying the mortgage and utilities for the time being. Mara requested that the agreement be put in writing and filed with the court.<\/p>\n \u201cThat\u2019s fair,\u201d Judge Porter said.<\/p>\n When the hearing concluded, Ruth gathered her purse without looking at Mara. Frank spoke in a low voice to Andrew, who stood with Calder and the other attorneys. For a moment, Mara thought her husband might approach her again, but he stayed where he was.<\/p>\n Outside the courtroom, Andrew finally caught up with her in the corridor. \u201cYou could have talked to me before bringing all this in.\u201d<\/p>\n Mara stopped beside a tall window. Afternoon light lay across the floor, bright enough to show the faint scuffs in the stone.<\/p>\n \u201cI did talk to you,\u201d she said. \u201cI asked questions for years.\u201d<\/p>\n He looked toward the courtroom doors. \u201cI didn\u2019t know the agreement was going to be filed like that.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThen you should help your attorney find out who sent it.\u201d<\/p>\n Andrew pressed his lips together. For a moment, he looked less like the assured man who had sat between three lawyers and more like the husband she had once tried to understand. That familiar expression stirred something in her, but it did not erase the papers or the years she had spent making excuses for what she could not explain.<\/p>\n \u201cThe company number is complicated,\u201d he said. \u201cThe lender\u2019s report doesn\u2019t tell the whole story.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThen the review can tell the whole story.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cYou know what this will do to my family.\u201d<\/p>\n Mara held his gaze. \u201cI know what it would have done to me if I had signed the agreement.\u201d<\/p>\n He did not answer.<\/p>\n She walked away before the conversation could turn into another exchange in which she was asked to carry the discomfort created by someone else\u2019s decisions.<\/p>\n The following weeks were quieter than she expected, though not easy. The financial professional reviewed the company\u2019s books, questioned the way several expenses had been categorized, and requested records concerning Andrew\u2019s ownership share. A review of the electronic-signature account showed that it had been created through a computer registered to the company\u2019s administrative office. The records did not, by themselves, establish who had opened it, but they narrowed the path of inquiry.<\/p>\n The parties\u2019 attorneys also discovered that the account had been used for no other purpose. Messages connected to it had been sent from a company address, and one referred to \u201cthe settlement packet\u201d as though the arrangement had already been approved. Andrew maintained that he had not personally created the account. He said an office employee might have misunderstood instructions.<\/p>\n Mara did not know what to believe, and she stopped trying to decide the answer before the evidence was complete. That, she realized, was one of the things her legal training had taught her: a suspicion could point toward a question, but it was not the same as proof.<\/p>\n At the follow-up hearing, Calder told the court that Andrew no longer intended to rely on the disputed agreement. He offered a revised proposal that included a neutral valuation of the business, a full exchange of financial statements, and a settlement conference after the review was complete.<\/p>\n Judge Porter asked whether Mara had received all the records she had requested.<\/p>\n \u201cNot all of them, Your Honor,\u201d Mara said. \u201cBut the remaining items are listed in the parties\u2019 proposed schedule.\u201d<\/p>\n The judge looked at Calder. He confirmed that his client would provide them.<\/p>\n The full review took several more weeks. It did not show that the company\u2019s entire reported net worth belonged to Andrew, and it did not support the figure of eighty thousand dollars he had first disclosed. The business had significant expenses and debts, but his ownership interest was worth considerably more than the original statement suggested. The review also identified personal and family expenses that had been recorded through the company over several years, including costs connected to the Ellison household.<\/p>\n The difference mattered. It gave both sides a more honest starting point for dividing what had been built during the marriage.<\/p>\n The email account remained a separate issue. The company\u2019s technology records showed that an administrator had created it at Andrew\u2019s direction, though the available record did not identify who had typed Mara\u2019s name or completed the electronic signing process. Andrew\u2019s attorneys withdrew the agreement from the case and stated that he would not ask the court to enforce it.<\/p>\n There was no public confession. There was no tidy answer to every question Mara had carried into the courtroom.<\/p>\n There was, however, a new settlement based on a verified business valuation and a complete accounting of the marital finances. It provided Mara with a fair share of the assets, temporary support while she settled into a new home, and a written explanation of how the company\u2019s value had been calculated. She reviewed every page before signing.<\/p>\n On the day she returned to Judge Porter\u2019s courtroom to finalize the agreement, Mara wore a simple navy suit and carried the same leather briefcase. The room looked smaller than it had the first time. Andrew sat with Calder. Ruth and Frank were not there.<\/p>\n Judge Porter reviewed the terms and asked Mara whether she understood what she was agreeing to.<\/p>\n \u201cYes, Your Honor.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cAnd are you signing this agreement voluntarily?\u201d<\/p>\n Mara glanced down at the documents. This time, the signature line belonged to her. The figures had been reviewed, the language was clear, and she knew what each page meant.<\/p>\n \u201cI am.\u201d<\/p>\n She signed her name slowly.<\/p>\n After the hearing, Andrew waited near the corridor window. He had lost some of the ease he once carried into every room, though he still looked like a man who hoped a conversation might help him recover what had already changed.<\/p>\n \u201cI wish we\u2019d handled this differently,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n Mara put the papers into her briefcase. \u201cSo do I.\u201d<\/p>\n He looked as if he might ask her for something more\u2014for reassurance, perhaps, or a softer version of the truth. She could not give him either. Not because she wanted to punish him, but because she had finally learned that kindness did not require her to make the past sound smaller than it was.<\/p>\n She left the courthouse and stepped into the clear Ohio afternoon. For years, she had believed her silence was proof of patience, that keeping the peace meant keeping the family together, and that loyalty asked her to make room for everyone else\u2019s comfort before her own.<\/p>\n The hearing had not changed her into someone new. It had reminded her of the person she had been before she learned to make herself quiet.<\/p>\n Behind her, Andrew and his attorneys remained in the courthouse. Ahead, the sidewalk led toward the street, where Mara\u2019s car was waiting and her life, at last, belonged to her again.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The Woman They Mistook for a Stranger The first person to laugh when Mara Ellison entered the courtroom was her mother-in-law. Ruth Ellison raised a graceful hand toward her mouth, … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":25067,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,16,6,5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25069","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-family","category-inspiration","category-news","category-real-life-story"],"brizy_media":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/storyreadin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25069","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/storyreadin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/storyreadin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/storyreadin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/storyreadin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=25069"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/storyreadin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25069\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25070,"href":"https:\/\/storyreadin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25069\/revisions\/25070"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/storyreadin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/25067"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/storyreadin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=25069"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/storyreadin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=25069"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/storyreadin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=25069"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}A Signature on Paper<\/h1>\n
\n
\n\u201cIt was included in the materials produced during pretrial disclosure, Your Honor. I also have the correspondence identifying the account.\u201d<\/p>\n
\n
\nMara looked at him. \u201cThen your client should explain who created it and why it was used.\u201d<\/p>\n